Leap Trends · Leadership · Middle management
Also touches on the condition Technology · How we choose the condition
Briefing
Engineering managers writing code and engineers directing AI agents
- Engineering managers
- Hands-on management
- Coding agents
Technical managers in the software industry are once again writing and reviewing code themselves. LeadDev sees the share of engineering managers doing more hands-on work rise from 20 to 35 per cent in a year, and engineers spend more time directing AI agents.
This briefing has not been updated for more than three months. Check the figures against the source before you use them.
Compiled with AI from public sources, with the source for every figure. Key figures labelled Checked have been compared with the source by a person. How that works
Key figures
- 35%of engineering managers did more hands-on technical work in 2026 than a year earlier; in 2025 the figure was 20%.LeadDevNot yet checked
- 44%of CTOs in the same survey spent more time coding and reviewing code themselves than the year before.LeadDevNot yet checked
- 46%of engineering managers regularly use AI agents, against 63.5% of staff+ engineers (over 900 respondents).The Pragmatic EngineerNot yet checked
What the sources say
For its Engineering Leadership Report 2026, LeadDev surveyed six hundred technical leaders in the software industry. Of these, 37 per cent are doing more hands-on technical work than in 2025. Among engineering managers the share rose from 20 to 35 per cent in a year. At every level, leaders spent more time coding and reviewing code themselves: 41 per cent of tech leads, 31 per cent of managers of engineers, 30 per cent of managers of managers and 44 per cent of CTOs. They also gave more time to architecture decisions and technical strategy. LeadDev sets the figures against a backdrop of organisations becoming flatter while AI changes how code is written and reviewed.
Between 27 January and 17 February 2026, The Pragmatic Engineer surveyed over nine hundred readers, both engineers and managers. Of these, 95 per cent use AI tools every week and 55 per cent use agents regularly. Use varies by role: 63.5 per cent of staff+ engineers, 49.7 per cent of other engineers, 46.1 per cent of engineering managers and 51.9 per cent of directors and VPs. In their April 2026 analysis, the authors read in the responses that engineers increasingly have to orchestrate and switch between tasks, while engineering managers are able to build more themselves. In their view, the roles of engineer and manager are starting to resemble each other.
Stack Overflow sees the shift on the engineer’s side too. In its Developer Survey 2026, with 30,903 respondents from 169 countries, the company quotes its own CEO, Prashanth Chandrasekar: with AI, every individual becomes almost a manager of agents. Chandrasekar offers this as a possible explanation for the share of respondents working as a one-person business, which rose from 3.9 to 10.5 per cent in a year.
What this does to management has not yet been measured. Leaders LeadDev spoke to, such as Emma Bostian of Spotify and Paul Williams of Bloomberg, see value in staying technical, while holding on to vision, stakeholder alignment and growing the team as the core of the role. See also the briefing Span of control and how much hands-on work managers still do, in which Gallup measures the point beyond which a manager’s own hands-on work drags down team engagement.
How solid is this? Two independent publishers see the same movement in 2026, both with self-selected readers from the software industry and with no earlier series apart from LeadDev’s single comparison year. Nobody yet measures how much time managers spend on their own work and what that does to the team.
For the leadership team
If the technical manager is writing code again and the engineer is directing a group of agents, who still has time to talk to the people in the team? The question for the leadership team is how much hands-on work a manager can take on before the managing suffers, and whether anyone keeps track of where that line lies in their own teams.
Sources
- Stack OverflowStack Overflow Developer Survey 2026
With AI, every individual becomes almost a manager of agents.
- LeadDev · Chantal KapaniEngineering managers are back in the codebase
- The Pragmatic Engineer · Gergely Orosz and Elin NilssonThe impact of AI on software engineers in 2026: key trends. Part 1
It’s interesting to see the engineer and manager roles becoming more similar.
- The Pragmatic Engineer · Gergely Orosz and Elin NilssonAI Tooling for Software Engineers in 2026
We summarise in our own words and quote no more than one sentence per source. Read the original: there is more in it. How we use sources.
Academic research
- Université de Bordeaux · Robbes et al.Agentic Much? Adoption of Coding Agents on GitHub
Academic articles on the same phenomenon, no more than a year old at the last search, from universities in Europe and North America, found through the open database OpenAlex. These articles count towards the publications per month; the text and key figures above are based on the sources. How we choose the articles.
How this briefing has been updated
Title now describes the topics; previously “The engineering manager is back in the code” (AI)
Added 1 article from universities in Europe and North America (via OpenAlex). (AI)
First draft based on LeadDev, The Pragmatic Engineer and Stack Overflow, all three with self-selected samples from the software industry. The full LeadDev report sits behind a registration wall and has not been read. (AI)