Leap Trends · Leadership · Responsible leadership
Briefing
Public support for CEOs who speak out on social issues
- Support and backing
- CEO activism
- Reputation
Support among Americans for CEOs who speak out on social or political issues fell from 65 per cent in 2018 to 55 per cent in 2026, and the share who shun a product over such a stance doubled. Support holds only for issues that affect the company itself.
This briefing has not been updated for more than three months. Check the figures against the source before you use them.
Compiled with AI from public sources, with the source for every figure. Key figures labelled Checked have been compared with the source by a person. How that works
Key figures
- 55%of Americans think CEOs should speak out on issues they consider important; in 2018 it was 65%.Stanford Graduate School of Business, Rock Center and Hoover InstitutionNot yet checked
- 62%can name a product they use less because of a stance taken by the company or its CEO; in 2018 it was 35%.Stanford Graduate School of Business, Rock Center and Hoover InstitutionNot yet checked
- 47%of Americans think businesses should take a public stance on current events; in 2025 it was 51%.Gallup and Bentley UniversityNot yet checked
- 9%of US board directors say their CEO has ever spoken out on a sensitive issue on the company's behalf.ESG Today, on the What Directors Think survey by Corporate Board Member, Diligent and FTI ConsultingNot yet checked
What the sources say
In 2018 Stanford first asked Americans whether the CEO of a large company should use their position to speak out on social or political issues the CEO personally cares about. Back then, 65 per cent said yes. In the summer of 2026 Larcker, Seru and Tayan put the same question to 2,807 Americans, weighted by age, income and region, and arrived at 55 per cent. The decline is across the board: among Democrats from 72 to 65 per cent, among Republicans from 57 to 48, and among independents from 65 to 51. Millennials fell from 71 to 59 per cent, Generation X from 63 to 46. Only Generation Z, too young to take part in 2018, backs it, at 70 per cent. Support actually rises when the issue directly affects the company or its employees: 76 per cent, against 72 per cent in 2018. The environment is still acceptable territory; political questions and contested social issues less and less so.
The costs and benefits are lopsided. Of those surveyed, 62 per cent can name unprompted a product they use less because of a stance taken by the company or its CEO; in 2018 it was 35 per cent. Forty per cent name a product they have started using more, against 20 per cent in 2018. Willingness to buy less from a CEO with an unwelcome opinion rose by 14 points, willingness to buy more by 3. Larcker told Fortune that people are tired of politics in their daily lives and no longer want to hear it from the companies they deal with.
Gallup finds the same direction with a different question. In May 2026, 47 per cent of 3,270 American adults said businesses should take a public stance on current events, against 51 per cent in 2025 and 48 per cent in 2022. Among Democrats it fell by nine points in a single year. Of those in work, 56 per cent say their employer need not send them its views, a majority for the second year running. The boardroom had already gone quiet: in a survey by Corporate Board Member, Diligent and FTI Consulting of just over two hundred US board directors, 85 per cent see more risk in speaking than in staying silent, and 18 per cent want the board to encourage management to speak out. Nine per cent say their CEO has ever done so on the company’s behalf. Edelman, meanwhile, finds that seven in ten people worldwide hesitate to trust someone with different values, and points to the employer as the place where that trust can still be built.
How solid is the evidence? Moderately. Two series point the same way, Stanford from 2018 to 2026 and Gallup from 2022 to 2026, and the board directors confirm it from the other side. All the evidence is American. Until a European measurement is added, this is something to watch rather than a given to build on.
For the leadership team
The sources suggest that a stance from the top loses more customers than it wins, and that most employees would rather not hear one even from their own employer. The question for the leadership team is which issues the company still has something to say about, and who decides that in advance rather than the CEO in the moment.
Sources
- Gallup and Bentley University · Stephanie Marken and Julie RaySupport for Businesses Taking a Public Stance Cools
A slim majority, 53%, say businesses should not take a public stance.
- Fortune · Phil WahbaAmericans are souring on CEOs who speak out on social and political issues
- Stanford Graduate School of Business, Rock Center and Hoover Institution · David F. Larcker, Amit Seru and Brian Tayan2026 CEO Activism Survey
People are clearly wary of executives using their position to advance a message.
- Lewis Silkin (commentary on the Edelman report)Edelman Trust Barometer 2026
- ESG Today, on the What Directors Think survey by Corporate Board Member, Diligent and FTI Consulting · Mark SegalMore than 80% of U.S. Board Directors Prefer Executives Stay Quiet on Social Issues
We summarise in our own words and quote no more than one sentence per source. Read the original: there is more in it. How we use sources.
Academic research
- Arizona State University · Das et al.How corporate sociopolitical activism in brand communication shapes brand engagement and consumer-based brand equity: the roles of moral intensity, business rel
- University of Virginia · Hou and PoliquinValues and visibility: How CEO activism influences private and public consumer choices
- Stanford University · Li and SouleCEO Activism and Corporate Reputation: How Authenticity and CSR Mitigate Stakeholder Misalignment
- Texas A&M University · Nair and MooijmanStakeholder Political Ideology, Purpose of Business Beliefs, and Responses to CEO Activism: Introducing an Asymmetry Model
- University of Wisconsin–Oshkosh · Soderberg et al.Employee perceptions of CEO political activism in organisations
Academic articles on the same phenomenon, no more than a year old at the last search, from universities in Europe and North America, found through the open database OpenAlex. These articles count towards the publications per month; the text and key figures above are based on the sources. How we choose the articles.
How this briefing has been updated
Title now describes the topics; previously “Less applause for the CEO with an opinion” (AI)
Added 5 articles from universities in Europe and North America (via OpenAlex). (AI)
First draft based on Stanford, Gallup, Fortune, ESG Today and Lewis Silkin. (AI)