Skip to content
Leap TrendsBeta

NLEN

What do you think of this page?

Leap Trends is in beta. Your response goes to Leap and helps us improve the pages. You can respond anonymously; the page you are on is sent along automatically. Privacy statement

How useful is this page for your work?
1 not useful5 very useful

↑ ↓ to choose · enter to openUpdated 5 November 2026 · by Leap Company

Leap Trends · Structure · Meeting structures

Condition

Structure

Theme

Meeting structures

The publications focus mainly on the quality of meetings, the role of the chair, online meetings and who gets to speak.

The conclusions and topics were compiled with AI from the publications on this page, with the sources alongside. How that works · How we count

What the publications show

  1. A Finnish survey of 1,910 employees (Tampere University) finds that good time management goes together with greater satisfaction and less meeting load. The link varies by role, with distinct patterns for managers, regular chairs and remote workers.

    Tampere University, 2026 (opens in a new window)

  2. Several studies place the quality of meetings with the chair. The University of Arizona sees the chair’s meeting style helping to shape how online meetings go, and a practitioner article from UTHealth Houston points to chairs who take on the role without any preparation.

    University of Arizona, 2025 (opens in a new window) · The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 2025 (opens in a new window) · Mälardalen University, 2026 (opens in a new window)

  3. Online meetings require work of their own. Mälardalen University sees chairs managing speaking turns, video and atmosphere all at once, and employees with hearing loss tell Linköping University of high listening effort, which captions and clear turn-taking ease.

    Mälardalen University, 2026 (opens in a new window) · Linköping University, 2025 (opens in a new window)

  4. Interviews with 34 employees (North Dakota State University) show that behaviour in meetings stems from the person and the organisation together. A packed meeting schedule, for example, forces participants to choose how much time is left for preparation.

    North Dakota State University, 2026 (opens in a new window)

  5. Two University of Helsinki studies look at participation in meetings. A colleague can make room for someone working in a second language, and in long-term care managers switch between gathering opinions and seeking confirmation of a proposal.

    University of Helsinki, 2026 (opens in a new window) · University of Helsinki, 2025 (opens in a new window)

Topics within meeting structures

This list shows what the publications on this theme are about, with the number for each topic. Open a topic to see its publications; if a topic has a briefing, the link is underneath.

All publications on meeting structures

This list shows every publication on this theme, including those not (yet) part of a briefing. Choose a period; a title opens the publication at its source.

  1. An L2 speaker’s developing participation as a joint achievement: Proposal sequences in workplace meeting interaction (opens the publication in a new window)University of Helsinki · Lehtimaja et al. · · researchMeeting structures
  2. Meeting quality and employee well-being: determinants of meeting satisfaction, engagement and strain (opens the publication in a new window)Tampere University · Hirva et al. · · researchMeeting structures
  3. An investigation on how individual and organizational factors influence the use of counterproductive meeting behaviors (opens the publication in a new window)North Dakota State University · Beck et al. · · researchMeeting structures
  4. Verbal, visual and affective work when chairing digital meetings: a micro-ethnographic study (opens the publication in a new window)Mälardalen University · Uhlin et al. · · researchMeeting structures
  5. The digital workplace and meeting accessibility: A qualitative study on listening effort in video meetings for employees with hearing loss (opens the publication in a new window)Linköping University · Marsja et al. · · researchMeeting structures
  6. Doing meetings online (opens the publication in a new window)University of Arizona · Peraldi et al. · · researchMeeting structures
  7. From agenda to action: The role of the meeting leader (opens the publication in a new window)The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · Ruppert · · researchMeeting structures
  8. Striving for different opinions or seeking verification: the storylines of collaborative decision-making in workplace meetings in long-term care (opens the publication in a new window)University of Helsinki · Lehto-Niskala · · researchMeeting structuresDecision-making